DUSHANBE, July 24, 2014, Asia-Plus – The Supreme Court has temporarily suspended the execution of the decision over the “intelligentsia criticism” case, under which the newspaper Asia-Plus and its editor Olga Tutubalina must 30,000 somoni to three plaintiffs over an article quoting Lenin’s criticism of the intelligentsia.  The newspaper and Ms. Tutubalina are expected to pay 15,000 somoni each.

Inoyat Inoyatov, the defense lawyer for Asia-Plus and Ms. Tutubalina, says, “The execution of the decision will be temporarily suspended until consideration of the case in the appeals court of the Supreme Court.”

Meanwhile, the newspaper has paid 5,000 somoni and Tutubalina has paid 1,000 somoni to the plaintiffs so far.

As it had been reported earlier, the appeal court of the Dushanbe city court on April 30 upheld the judgment filed by a court in Dushanbe’s Firdavsi district against newspaper Asia-Plus and its editor Olga Tutubalina.  The Supreme Court upheld the judgment on June 26.

We will recall that the Firdavsi district court that considered a case pitting five Tajik creating unions and three separate individuals (D. Abdiyeva, A. Rajabov and H. Rahmatov) against the Asia-Plus newspaper and its editor, Ms. Olga Tutubalina, ruled on February 25 that the newspaper and its editor must publish a disclaimer and pay 30,000 somoni to D. Abdiyeva, A. Rajabov and H. Rahmatov.

Five Tajik creative unions and thee separate individuals have filed a lawsuit against the Asia-Plus newspaper and its editor Olga Tutubalina, asking for 200,000 somoni as compensation for moral damage.

The case stems from the article “Unintelligent about Intelligentsia” by Olga Tutubalina published in the newspaper on May 29, 2013.  In her article about Tajik intelligentsia, Ms. Tutubalina used citation from Lenin’s letter to Maxim Gorky of September 15, 1919, “The intellectual forces of the workers and peasants are growing and getting stronger in their fight to overthrow the bourgeoisie and their accomplices, the educated classes, the lackeys of capital, who consider themselves the brains of the nation.  In fact they are not its brains but its shit.”

Plaintiffs say the article by Olga Tutubalina insulted honor and dignity as well as reputation of a large social group of people and caused moral damage to them.

For her part, Ms. Tutubalina said that she did not mean to insult anyone.  At the same time, she insisted she had nothing to apologize for.

The United States Embassy in Dushanbe issued a statement expressing concern over the verdict which it said would have “a chilling effect on freedom of the press in Tajikistan.”

The OSCE’s Representative on Freedom of the Media, Ms. Dunja Mijatović, also criticized the decision, particularly the idea that an ill-defined body of people can be collectively defamed.

“If those who can claim injury are not clearly defined, any disagreement of opinion could end up as a damage claim,” she said in a statement, urging the Tajik authorities to allow “public debate without triggering financial penalties.”