DUSHANBE, February 4, 2011  -- Quietly but steadily Central Asia’s basic human and physical infrastructure – the roads, power plants, hospitals and schools and the last generation of Soviet-trained specialists who have kept this all running – is disappearing, report released by International Crisis Group (ISG) on February 3 says.

All countries in the region are to some degree affected, but the two poorest, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, are already in dire straits.  Their own specialists say that in the next few years, they will have no teachers for their children and no doctors to treat their sick.

Experts in both countries are haunted by the increasingly likely prospect of catastrophic systemic collapse, especially in the energy sector.  Barring a turnaround in policies, they face a future of decaying roads, schools and medical institutions staffed by pensioners, or a new generation of teachers, doctors or engineers whose qualifications were purchased rather than earned. These problems will be exacerbated by other deep political vulnerabilities in both countries – the gradual increase of an insurgency and an aging autocrat in Tajikistan, and a dangerously weakened Kyrgyz state.

The current predicament has many causes.  As part of the Soviet Union, the five countries were tightly woven into a single system, especially in energy and transport.  These interdependencies have proven difficult to unravel, and have produced serious imbalances.  During the Soviet era, the countries were obliged to work together. Now they no longer have to get along, and usually do not, especially as far as energy is concerned. Education and healthcare suffered with the end of the social safety net.  Most importantly, governments across the region seemed to feel their Soviet inheritance would last forever, and the funds earmarked for reforms, education, training and maintenance were often misused and insufficient.

The rapid deterioration of infrastructure will deepen poverty and alienation from the state. The disappearance of basic services will provide Islamic radicals, already a serious force in many Central Asian states, with further ammunition against regional leaders and openings to establish influential support networks.  Economic development and poverty reduction will become a distant dream; the poorest states will become ever more dependent on the export of labor.  Anger over a sharp decline in basic services played a significant role in the unrest that led to the overthrow of Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev in April 2010. It could well play a similar role in other countries, notably Tajikistan, in the not too distant future.

The needs are clear, and solutions to the decline in infrastructure are available.  The fundamental problem is that the vital prerequisites are steps that Central Asia’s ruling elites are unwilling to take.  These amount to nothing less than a total repudiation of regional leaders’ values and behavior.  They would need to purge their governments of top-to-bottom systemic corruption; cease using their countries’ resources as a source of fabulous wealth for themselves and their families; and create a meritocracy with decent pay that would free officials from the need to depend on corruption to make ends meet.  All these changes are so far from current realities that foreign governments and donors may dismiss them as hopelessly idealistic.  Yet without organized change from above, there is a growing risk of chaotic change from below.

Donors are doing nothing to prevent such a scenario.  Their cautious approach seems driven by the desire not to upset regional leaders, rather than using the financial levers at their disposal to effect real change.  Aid is often disbursed to fulfill annual plans or advance broader geopolitical aims.  Donors have made no effort to form a united front to push for real reform.  Without their involvement, the status quo can stumble along for a few more years, perhaps, but not much longer.  Collapsing infrastructure could bring down with it enfeebled regimes, creating enormous uncertainty in one of the most fragile parts of the world.